• Sep 11, 2025 News!A full waiver of Article Processing Charges (APC) for articles accepted until December 31, 2026   [Click]
  • Mar 27, 2026 News! JAAI Volume 4, Number 1 is available now   [Click]
  • Jan 07, 2026 News!JAAI opened Online OJS Submission System, please submit your paper via it   [Click]
General Information
    • Abbreviated Title: J. Adv. Artif. Intell.
    • E-ISSN: 2972-4503
    • Frequency: Quarterly
    • DOI: 10.18178/JAAI
    • Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Hao Luo
    • Managing Editor: Ms. Jennifer X. Zeng
    • E-mail: editor@jaai.net
Editor-in-chief
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Hao Luo
Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
 
It is my honor to be the editor-in-chief of JAAI. The journal publishes good papers in the field of artificial intelligence. Hopefully, JAAI will become a recognized journal among the readers in the field of artificial intelligence.


 
JAAI 2026 Vol.4(1):59-75
DOI: 10.18178/JAAI.2026.4.1.59-75

Performance Evaluation of SXI++ and Comparative Triage Machine Learning Models for Enhanced Medical Decision‐ Making

Mahesh Banavar1,*, Reeshabh Kumar2,Prashant Yadav2, Srinivas Kilambi2,*
1. Department of ECE, Clarkson University, Potsdam, USA.
2. Sriya.AI, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Email: mbanavar@clarkson.edu (M.B.); sk@sriyaai.com (S.K.)
*Corresponding author

Manuscript submitted December 26, 2025; accepted January 23, 2026; published March 27, 2026


Abstract—Effective triage is vital to prioritize patient care and optimize resource utilization. This study compares traditional machine learning, represented by an XGBoost classifier, with SXI++, a proprietary deep neural network and ensemble learning framework, for predicting Emergency Severity Index (ESI) levels. An emergency department dataset of 560,486 records and 972 features was reduced to 180 through correlation filtering, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, and principal component analysis. A 100,000-record sample was imputed, normalized, and split into training (70%), validation (10%), and test (20%) sets. On the large dataset test set (10,000 records), SXI++ achieved 99.8% accuracy, 99.8% precision, 99.8% sensitivity, 99.8% specificity, and an AUC of 0.999, outperforming XGBoost (82.9% accuracy, 85.5% precision, 73.7% sensitivity, 91.1% specificity, AUC 0.779) and SXI (90.76% accuracy, 80.97% precision, 90.7% sensitivity, 92.0% specificity, AUC 0.967). Validation on a smaller dataset of 1,267 adult ED cases confirmed adaptability, with SXI++ achieving 100% accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. These findings highlight SXI++’s potential for accurate and scalable triage automation. However, near-perfect metrics warrant further validation on diverse, real-world datasets to assess generalizability, computational efficiency, and overfitting risk before clinical deployment.

keywords—triage prediction, artificial intelligence, SXI++, machine learning, deep neural networks

Cite: Mahesh Banavar, Reeshabh Kumar, Prashant Yadav, Srinivas Kilambi,"Performance Evaluation of SXI++ and Comparative Triage Machine Learning Models for Enhanced Medical Decision‐ Making," Journal of Advances in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 59-75, 2026. doi: 10.18178/JAAI.2026.4.1.59-75

Copyright © 2026 by the authors. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Copyright © 2023-2026. Journal of Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Unless otherwise stated.

E-mail: editor@jaai.net